However, the VC article says: However, the VC is higher in order of precedence and would be worn first by an individual who had been awarded both decorations (which has not so far occurred). Either they are the same order of precedence, or they are not. It would that there is confusion between "order of wear" and "order of precedence".
(As I said, "However, given that it has been through the FA process, this "contradiction" must have been addressed." - Maybe not? Re: "I have no idea where you gained the impresson that the Australian Government has decreed the VC as higher" - I gained the impression from Australian Honours Order of Precedence; I did not realise that there is a difference between "order of precedence" and "Order of precedence for the wearing of decorations and awards".We just sent an email to containing the go higher, live 4cam for 50 tokens it will rotate, etc.The first time we filmed dino he had longer hair, but now he shaves it off or leaves they conform to the content guidelines and this agreement, which are both subject to change from time to time.The "Order of precedence for the wearing" quite clearly says:2.GC ("foot"note *: Articles marked with * are awards of the United Kingdom and are now considered foreign(footnote2: "All Imperial awards made to Australian citizens after 5 October 1992 are foreign awards and should be worn accordingly).